agent Entrepreneur logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

The Destination Is in Sight

While the road less traveled may not be the quickest path to our metaphorical destination, in the compliance world, both the destination and all other charges should be clearly and accurately disclosed and acknowledged by the consumer.

by Robert J. Wilson, Esquire
January 10, 2022
The Destination Is in Sight

While the road less traveled may not be the quickest path to our metaphorical destination, in the compliance world, both the destination and all other charges should be clearly and accurately disclosed and acknowledged by the consumer.

IMAGE: Getty Images

3 min to read


We all have destinations; the real question is how we get there. Recently in New York, the issue of the amount of the destination fee assessed in the sale of motor vehicles took center stage.

In 1958, Oklahoma Senator Almer Stillwell Monroney sponsored the Automobile Information Disclosure Act (Act) which gave rise to the requirement of a window sticker disclosure in motor vehicles named after the Senator commonly known as the Monroney sticker. As pertains to this article, the Act requires a window label containing: “true and correct entries disclosing...the amount charged, if any, to such dealer for the transportation of such automobile to the location at which it is delivered to such dealer [referred to as the destination charge].”

Ad Loading...

In May 2021, a class action suit was filed in New York claiming that various car manufacturers committed unfair and deceptive trade practices by including not only the cost of delivering vehicles to their dealer destination in the destination charge on the Monroney sticker, but also including profit in that number without disclosing that profit was included.

The lawsuit claimed that a destination charge is generally understood to represent the manufacturer’s average cost to deliver one of its vehicles to a dealership and complained that $1,495 per Chrysler-, Dodge-, Ram-, Jeep-, and Fiat-branded vehicle was improper. In addition, it compared the increase in destination charges of the class action vehicles (90% for Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep since 2021, 74% for Ram trucks since 2011, and 113% for Fiat since 2012) with the average increase of less than 20% for Audi, BMW, Infiniti, Lexus, Lincoln, Mercedes-Benz, and Volvo over the past decade.

In addition to the claimed disparity between the percentage of increase compared to other brands, was the more important claim that the defendants built in “a significant amount of profit” into their destination charge. The suit claimed that consumers are not allowed to negotiate the amount of the destination charge and understood that the destination charge was a pass-through cost, not the cost of shipping the vehicle plus profit. The claim also stated that there was no correlation between that actual the cost of delivery and the amount on the Monroney sticker. By way of comparison, the suit pointed out that Toyota’s Monroney sticker does not use the term “destination charge” but instead labels it “Delivery, Processing and Handling Fee” and explains on its website: “Toyota may make a profit on the Delivery, Processing and Handling Fee.”

While many dealers do not concern themselves with the Monroney sticker placed on vehicles by the manufacturer, the issue of clear and correct disclosure is a consistent theme in the compliance field. Everywhere in the sales process, from the first handshake until the delivery of keys, a dealer is required to make complete disclosures of such things as condition of the vehicle, credit scores, adverse action, and many others. Your best defense against concealment claims is clear and conspicuous disclosures, signed by the consumer.

While the road less traveled may not be the quickest path to our metaphorical destination, in the compliance world, both the destination and all other charges should be clearly and accurately disclosed and acknowledged by the consumer.

Ad Loading...

DISCLAIMER: Content provided in this article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice and should not be relied upon or acted upon without retaining counsel to provide specific legal advice based upon your particular situation, jurisdiction, and circumstances. No duties are assumed, intended, or created by this communication. No attorney-client relationship is being created by your review or use of this material.

© 2021 Robert J. Wilson, All Rights Reserved

Robert J. Wilson, Esquire (Bob) is a Philadelphia lawyer and is General Counsel for ARMD Resource Management Group. Bob’s practice is largely in the consumer finance space, and he regularly consults with Lenders and contributes articles on various compliance related issues.

READ: Focus on Fraud

Originally posted on Auto Dealer Today

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Industry

Foreign Cars Italia dealership store in front of sunset
Industryby Hannah MitchellJuly 2, 2026

Luxe N.C. Dealerships Change Hands

A collection of Italian and English brand franchises were handed off to the owner’s friend in the business and include the Carolinas’ only Ferrari retail stores.

Read More →
inside of car, person with hands on black steering wheel
Industryby Lauren LawrenceJuly 2, 2026

Exposure Drives Interest in Chinese Cars

At a recent demonstration, consumers had the chance to ride in a Chinese-branded vehicle, a firsthand experience that improved their perceptions and purchase intent.

Read More →
Woman's hands holding an wallet empty of cash
Industryby Hannah MitchellJuly 1, 2026

Automotive Consumers Sink Further in Debt

Most financing metrics hit records in the second quarter as more buyers locked themselves into long terms and high monthly payments.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Rob Mancuso sitting in a chair on stage
Industryby Hannah MitchellJuly 1, 2026

Agent Advocate

Rob Mancuso, who comes from a long line of auto dealers, values general agents’ place in the industry and makes a case for them taking an even bigger seat at the table.

Read More →
Photo of a touchscreen on a car's dashboard
Industryby Hannah MitchellJune 25, 2026

Driving Under Distraction

Though consumers gave higher marks to new vehicles in JD Power’s most recent initial-quality poll, high-tech interference worsened, pointing to craving for simplicity.

Read More →
split background green and blue. 2019 to 2025 with car going from starting location to end point. $37,310 and $48,402. Agent Entrepreneur logo
Industryby Lauren LawrenceJune 25, 2026

Affordable New Cars a Thing of the Past

More than one out of five new vehicles sell for more than $60,000, according to Edmunds. That's up 7% compared to prepandemic 2019.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Photo of multiple new SUVs on a car dealership lot
Industryby Hannah MitchellJune 22, 2026

State Follows Federal Warning on Auto Ads

The Massachusetts attorney general cautioned the state’s automotive dealers to be upfront with the consuming public about their vehicle prices or risk punishment.

Read More →
Gas pumps.
Industryby Lauren LawrenceJune 15, 2026

Consumer Outlook on the Rise

Younger generations are feeling more positive about their financial futures and current affordability pressures than older generations, according to recent TransUnion data.

Read More →
Group photo of men outside storefront.
Industryby Hannah MitchellMay 28, 2026

Pennsylvania Dealership Under New Retailers

The sale of the Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram store puts a family auto group on a leaner path as first-time dealers take the helm.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Hallway with lockered wiring and computer
Industryby Lauren LawrenceMay 28, 2026

Battery Storage Takes Priority Over EVs

U.S. automakers are prioritizing battery energy stationary storage over electric-vehicle production as the consumer demand for EVs lags the rest of the world.

Read More →
Ad Loading...