Federal Panel: GMAC Bailout Will Cost Taxpayers $6.3B
Washington -- Taxpayers likely will lose $6.3 billion or more on the bailout of GMAC Inc., a federal watchdog panel said in a report released Thursday. The Congressional Oversight Panel, which oversees the $700 billion Wall Street and auto bailouts, sharply criticized the government's $17.2 billion GMAC rescue, saying it "missed opportunities to increase accountability and better protect taxpayers' money," The Detroit News reported. The Treasury Department should consider recombining GMAC with its former parent, General Motors Co., the panel said. That step "would restore GM's financing operations to the model generally shared by other automotive manufacturers." Treasury said a merger between GMAC and GM would be up to the companies' boards, not the government."We would not initiate or take a position other than one supported by our board designees," spokeswoman Meg Reilly said. The government owns 56 percent of GMAC after three separate bailouts since December 2008. The oversight panel said bankruptcy was a viable option for the finance company. "In connection with the Chrysler and GM bankruptcies, Treasury might have been able to orchestrate a strategic bankruptcy for GMAC," it said. The panel said the bailout "reinforced GMAC's dominance" in dealer financing, and may have prevented the growth of more competition in lending. Unlike GM and Chrysler's bankruptcies, the panel said, the government bailout of GMAC did not require GMAC to present a viable plan for restoring profits, or offer a detailed explanation of how tax dollars would be used increase consumer lending. GMAC spokeswoman Gina Proia said the company is "focused on the future," and will continue "to provide the highest level of service to auto dealers and consumers," to restore high profits to GMAC and repay the government in full. GMAC, which lost $10.4 billion last year, is critical to the success of GM and Chrysler because it provides the bulk of financing for the automaker's dealers and consumers who buy their cars.
More Industry

Luxe N.C. Dealerships Change Hands
A collection of Italian and English brand franchises were handed off to the owner’s friend in the business and include the Carolinas’ only Ferrari retail stores.
Read More →
Exposure Drives Interest in Chinese Cars
At a recent demonstration, consumers had the chance to ride in a Chinese-branded vehicle, a firsthand experience that improved their perceptions and purchase intent.
Read More →
Automotive Consumers Sink Further in Debt
Most financing metrics hit records in the second quarter as more buyers locked themselves into long terms and high monthly payments.
Read More →
Agent Advocate
Rob Mancuso, who comes from a long line of auto dealers, values general agents’ place in the industry and makes a case for them taking an even bigger seat at the table.
Read More →
Driving Under Distraction
Though consumers gave higher marks to new vehicles in JD Power’s most recent initial-quality poll, high-tech interference worsened, pointing to craving for simplicity.
Read More →
Affordable New Cars a Thing of the Past
More than one out of five new vehicles sell for more than $60,000, according to Edmunds. That's up 7% compared to prepandemic 2019.
Read More →
State Follows Federal Warning on Auto Ads
The Massachusetts attorney general cautioned the state’s automotive dealers to be upfront with the consuming public about their vehicle prices or risk punishment.
Read More →
Consumer Outlook on the Rise
Younger generations are feeling more positive about their financial futures and current affordability pressures than older generations, according to recent TransUnion data.
Read More →
Pennsylvania Dealership Under New Retailers
The sale of the Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram store puts a family auto group on a leaner path as first-time dealers take the helm.
Read More →
Battery Storage Takes Priority Over EVs
U.S. automakers are prioritizing battery energy stationary storage over electric-vehicle production as the consumer demand for EVs lags the rest of the world.
Read More →