Dealership Group to Pay $3.3 Million to Settle Junk-Fee, Discrimination Case
FTC accused Passport Automotive Group of deceitful ads, charges, and discriminatory lending.

The auto group must change business practices as part of the settlement.
IMAGE: Getty Images/KrizzDaPaul
Maryland-based Passport Automotive Group settled with the Federal Trade Commission over claims of junk fees and discrimination of black and Hispanic customers through higher financing costs and fees.
Passport will pay $3.3 million to settle the complaint. It also agreed to change business practices, including getting buyers’ express, informed consent before charging them any fees, and that its dealerships charge no financing markups or the same markup rate to all buyers.
The group operates nine car dealerships in the Washington, D.C., area.
The FTC said Passport ads told consumers they could buy certain inspected, reconditioned or certified vehicles at specific prices, but that in many cases, double pricing kicked in when the consumer tried to make a purchase based on those amounts. It said advertised prices included certification, inspection and more but that Passport added large, redundant “mandatory” fees for those adds.
The consumer-protection agency said Passport also illegally charged higher borrowing costs to black and Hispanic buyers compared to non-Hispanic white customers.
The complaint said that of the thousands of customers who secured financing through Passport from August 2017 to August 2020, Passport charged black customers, on average, about $291 more in interest, and Hispanic customers, on average, about $235 more. Black buyers were charged the maximum markup about 47% more often, and Hispanic buyers 38% more often than non-Hispanic white buyers. The minority buyers also paid more in junk fees, the FTC complaint says.
READ MORE: NADA Challenges the FTC's New Advertising and F&I Rules
Originally posted on F&I and Showroom
More Industry

Used EVs Defy Overall Market
While the used-car market saw three months of price declines or stagnation, the used EV segment did the opposite – rising for three straight months.
Read More →
Gone to the Dogs
A Stellantis brand decided to have some fun with one of its SUVs’ design to address growing emphasis on family pets.
Read More →
OEM Poll Sees Industry Evolution
Kerrigan Advisors’ survey of automakers finds that tariffs, technology, network tightening and other factors are poised to reshape auto retail.
Read More →
Luxe N.C. Dealerships Change Hands
A collection of Italian and English brand franchises were handed off to the owner’s friend in the business and include the Carolinas’ only Ferrari retail stores.
Read More →
Exposure Drives Interest in Chinese Cars
At a recent demonstration, consumers had the chance to ride in a Chinese-branded vehicle, a firsthand experience that improved their perceptions and purchase intent.
Read More →
Automotive Consumers Sink Further in Debt
Most financing metrics hit records in the second quarter as more buyers locked themselves into long terms and high monthly payments.
Read More →
Agent Advocate
Rob Mancuso, who comes from a long line of auto dealers, values general agents’ place in the industry and makes a case for them taking an even bigger seat at the table.
Read More →
Driving Under Distraction
Though consumers gave higher marks to new vehicles in JD Power’s most recent initial-quality poll, high-tech interference worsened, pointing to craving for simplicity.
Read More →
Affordable New Cars a Thing of the Past
More than one out of five new vehicles sell for more than $60,000, according to Edmunds. That's up 7% compared to prepandemic 2019.
Read More →
State Follows Federal Warning on Auto Ads
The Massachusetts attorney general cautioned the state’s automotive dealers to be upfront with the consuming public about their vehicle prices or risk punishment.
Read More →